Skip to Main Content

Publish: Predatory publishing

Predatory publishing

Predatory publishing is a term that encompasses many unethical scholarly publishing practices.

A defining element of predatory publishers is that they intentionally deceive authors by charging fees for publishing services that are either not provided, are of a substandard quality, or inferior to what was agreed.

Legitimate publishers are expected to transparently meet industry standards in editorial oversight, peer review, copy editing and archiving of past publications.

What to consider

Emails inviting you to submit an article or serve on an editorial board are often warning signs that require further investigation.

  • These emails often use poor language or contain typing errors
  • Sound too good to be true

Journal title sounds very similar to a reputable publication and may use words such as

  • Advanced, Global, International, World, Open

Website

  • may look unprofessional or of poor quality
  • contain many logos
  • incomplete contact information and email addresses
  • editors and editorial board members have no academic affiliations listed
  • wide range of journal titles from different disciplines
  • incomplete or unavailable links

Indexing and metrics

  • ISSN not complete
  • not included in well known index databases or ranking reports

Peer review and Instruction

  • unclear instructions to author
  • peer review process not well explained or appears extremely fast

There is an increasing prevalence of scams related to hijacked journals, where websites are created to fraudulently mimic an established journal. The sites, also referred to as ‘clone’, 'counterfeit' or ‘duplicate’ journals aim to entice authors to pay fees for publication in the fake journal.

Some tips to identify hijacked journals:

  • Be particularly cautious if contacted with an invitation to publish
  • Fees for open access publishing are often much lower than for legitimate journals
  • The ‘About’, peer review, publication ethics and scope information on the site may be very brief and include typos
  • Articles already published on the site are often of a low quality or copied from genuine journals but attributed incorrectly
  • Contact details may be minimal, including an email address only, with no physical location, phone number or individuals named
  • An unusually fast turn-around time between submission and publication may be advertised

Journal hijackers can go to a lot of effort to appear legitimate, using names of editors of real journals without their knowledge and links and logos of genuine citation databases.

Some ways to check if the journal is legitimate are:

  • Use the checklists available on Think Check Submit to assess the journal
  • Do a direct search for the journal title in search engines like Google to check if multiple results with slightly different domain names appear
  • Search citation databases like Scopus and Web of Science directly rather than following links
  • Retraction Watch have created a Hijacked Journal Checker which aims to list hijacked journal titles. However, lists of this type should not be used in isolation. It is important to use any list with caution, particularly in regards to the currency of the information and the criteria for inclusion on the list.

Vanity publishers may send unsolicited emails offering to publish your research.  In particular, vanity publishers will target higher degree students or recent graduates offering to publish a thesis as a book.  Many of these publishers provide very little or no editorial input or support and you will receive no marketing or distribution of your book after paying a large fee for their services.

Publishing with vanity presses may result in

  • the loss of Copyright to your work and further publishing opportunity
  • a poor quality publication
  • loss of academic reputation

Other resources

COPE (the Committee on Publication Ethics) provide resources on ethical practices in publishing. In addition to their Discussion paper on Predatory Publishing their website also includes information about best practice regarding:

  • Peer review
  • Authorship
  • Conflicts of interest
  • Data and reproducibility
  • Intellectual property
  • Misconduct
  • Other aspects of scholarly publishing